Skip to content
Concept

Sample data. This flow isn’t wired up. Every number below is illustrative, not reported trial data.

Contribute your trial’s safety data

A sketch of how a sponsor would add harmonized safety data under a shared agreement, and what they’d get back. This is a concept; it shows the shape of the idea, not a working submission.

1

Map your terms

Align your adverse-event terms to the shared vocabulary. We show the mapping for you to confirm before anything is submitted; nothing is auto-accepted.

2

Submit under a shared agreement

Your data is harmonized the same way as every other contributor’s. No sponsor ever sees another sponsor’s private data; only pooled, de-identified aggregates are shared.

3

Get your comparative view

See your own trial next to the pooled picture: the same rates, denominators, and term mappings, so you can benchmark without rebuilding the dataset yourself.

What you get back

Your trial, side by side with the pooled picture.

Sample
Your trial
Phase 2b · 233 analysed
Serious adverse events4%9 / 233
Any non-serious event71%165 / 233
Deaths0%0 / 233
Pooled, all contributors
14 trials · 1,980 analysed
Serious adverse events3%61 / 1,980
Any non-serious event68%1,346 / 1,980
Deaths<1%2 / 1,980

Illustrative figures. In the real thing, every number would carry its source and denominator, exactly like the rest of this site.

How trust is kept

  • • Every contributor’s data is harmonized the same way.
  • • No sponsor sees another’s private data.
  • • An independent group runs it; funding is capped per sponsor.
  • • The methods are public; sponsors keep their own FDA/EMA duties.

These are the neutrality principles behind the concept. see the full governance model.

Not a regulatory or clinical tool, and no medical advice. Not affiliated with any sponsor, regulator, or any organization whose trials appear here.